Continuous and bimonthly publication
ISSN (on-line): 1806-3756

Licença Creative Commons
10809
Views
Back to summary
Open Access Peer-Reviewed
Artigo Original

Ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation: description, risk factors for mortality, and performance of the SOFA score

Pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica em pacientes em ventilação mecânica prolongada: descrição, fatores de risco associados à mortalidade e desempenho do escore SOFA

Sebastián Ariel Núñez1, Guillermina Roveda1, Mariela Soledad Zárate2, Mónica Emmerich3, María Teresa Verón1

DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200569

ABSTRACT

Objective: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a serious complication of mechanical ventilation (MV). However, data on VAP in patients on prolonged MV (PMV) are scarce. We aimed to describe the characteristics of VAP patients on PMV and to identify factors associated with mortality. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including VAP patients on PMV. We recorded baseline characteristics, as well as 30-day and 90-day mortality rates. Variables associated with mortality were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model. Results: We identified 80 episodes of VAP in 62 subjects on PMV. The medians for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, SOFA score, and days on MV were, respectively, 69.5 years, 5, 4, and 56 days. Episodes of VAP occurred between days 21 and 50 of MV in 28 patients (45.2%) and, by day 90 of MV, in 48 patients (77.4%). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 30.0% and 63.7%, respectively. There were associations of 30-day mortality with the SOFA score (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.12-1.52; p < 0.001) and use of vasoactive agents (HR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2-12.9; p = 0.02), whereas 90-day mortality was associated with age (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05; p = 0.003), SOFA score (HR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.07-1.34; p = 0.001), use of vasoactive agents (HR = 4.07; 95% CI: 1.93-8.55; p < 0.001), and COPD (HR = 3.35; 95% CI: 1.71-6.60; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Mortality rates in VAP patients on PMV are considerably high. The onset of VAP can occur various days after MV initiation. The SOFA score is useful for predicting fatal outcomes. The factors associated with mortality could help guide therapeutic decisions and determine prognosis.

Keywords: Pneumonia, ventilator-associated; Critical care; Ventilators, mechanical.

RESUMO

Objetivo: A pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica (PAVM) é uma séria complicação da ventilação mecânica (VM). Entretanto, dados sobre PAVM em pacientes em VM prolongada (VMP) são escassos. Nosso objetivo foi descrever as características de pacientes com PAVM em VMP e identificar fatores associados à mortalidade. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo incluindo pacientes com PAVM em VMP. Foram registradas características basais, bem como as taxas de mortalidade em 30 e 90 dias. As variáveis associadas à mortalidade foram determinadas por meio da análise de sobrevida de Kaplan-Meier e do modelo de regressão de Cox. Resultados: Foram identificados 80 episódios de PAVM em 62 indivíduos em VMP. As medianas de idade, índice de comorbidade de Charlson, pontuação no SOFA, e dias em VM foram, respectivamente, de 69,5 anos, 5, 4 e 56 dias. Os episódios de PAVM ocorreram entre o 21º e o 50º dia de VM em 28 pacientes (45,2%) e até o 90º dia de VM em 48 pacientes (77,4%). As taxas de mortalidade em 30 e 90 dias foram de 30,0% e 63.7%, respectivamente. A mortalidade em 30 dias associou-se a pontuação no SOFA (razão de risco [RR] = 1,30; IC95%: 1,12-1,52; p < 0,001) e uso de drogas vasoativas (RR = 4,0; IC95%: 1,2-12,9; p = 0,02), enquanto a mortalidade em 90 dias associou-se a idade (RR = 1,03; IC95%: 1,00-1,05; p = 0,003), pontuação no SOFA (RR = 1,20; IC95%: 1,07-1,34; p = 0,001), uso de drogas vasoativas (RR = 4,07; IC95%: 1,93-8,55; p < 0,001) e DPOC (RR = 3,35; IC95%: 1,71-6,60; p < 0,001). Conclusões: As taxas de mortalidade em pacientes com PAVM em VMP são consideravelmente altas. O início da PAVM pode ocorrer vários dias após a instituição da VM. O escore SOFA é útil para predição de desfechos fatais. Os fatores associados à mortalidade podem ajudar a orientar as decisões terapêuticas e a determinar o prognóstico.

Palavras-chave: Pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica; Cuidados críticos; Ventiladores mecânicos.

INTRODUCTION
 
In recent years, progress in medical care has led to a decrease in in-hospital mortality of critically ill patients.(1,2) The increase in survival in the acute stage of a critical illness has caused a progressive increase in the population of subjects with chronic critical illness (CCI). The prevalence of CCI is 7.6% of the number of admissions to ICUs in the United States(3) and can be as high as 33% in patients presenting with acute respiratory failure.(4) Although the definition of CCI is heterogeneous, the need for prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) is the most important feature to define it.(5,6) One of the latest and most widely used definitions of CCI describes it as the length of ICU stay of 8 or more days, associated with at least one of the following conditions: mechanical ventilation (MV) for 96 h or more, tracheostomy, sepsis, severe wounds, and multiple organ failure.(7) The definition of PMV also varies among authors, although the most widely used one is the need for MV for 21 days or more, at least for 6 h/day.(8,9) Using this definition, the incidence of PMV in patients on MV admitted to an ICU ranges from 6.3% to 9.9%.(10,11)
 
Infections in patients on PMV are one of the most common complications. In a multicenter study that included 1,419 patients on PMV, the top six complications recorded over a 1-year period were infections, the most frequent of which were urinary tract infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in 34.5% and 31.0% of the patients, respectively.(12) The high risk of infections is due to multiple factors: prolonged use of invasive elements (tracheostomy tube, catheters, etc.), prolonged exposure to environments contaminated with virulent and resistant microorganisms, and immunological alterations due to comorbidities and the recent critical illness of the patient.(13)
 
VAP is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections. Roughly, 10% of patients requiring MV develop VAP, with a mortality rate of 20-50%.(14,15) It is known that the clinical presentation and management of VAP differ in patients on PMV.(16) The risk of VAP in patients on PMV is lower than that in those who are in the acute stage of MV, but it increases by 1-3% the duration of MV per day, suggesting that between 50% and 66% of tracheostomized patients will develop VAP.(17) The impact of respiratory infections on patients on PMV is relevant and has been linked to increased mortality.(18) However, data on VAP in patients on PMV are scarce. Not only do most of the studies about VAP include patients on acute MV, but differences in the definitions of PMV and CCI have revealed that the knowledge on the subject is sparse and almost incomparable.
 
The SOFA score is a widely used tool for predicting mortality in septic ICU patients.(19) However, its utility in subjects with CCI has yet to be well established.
 
The objective of the present study was to describe the characteristics of VAP patients on PMV, to determine factors that are associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality, and to evaluate the performance of the SOFA score as a predictor of mortality in this population.
 
METHODS
 
Study design
 
We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients on PMV and diagnosed with VAP who were admitted to the Chronic Critical Patients Unit (CCPU) at the Sanatorio Güemes, located in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina, between June of 2015 and October of 2019. Our institution is a 680-bed university-affiliated acute-care general hospital. The CCPU is a 24-bed unit developed for the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with CCI. Patients admitted to the CCPU are mainly referred from ICUs and stroke units. The overall mortality rate in the CCPU is 44.8%, and 179 patients are admitted per year on average. VAP prevention bundles include elevation of head of bed to 30-45 degrees, daily spontaneous breathing trials, oral decontamination, and endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring. We used the hospital-acquired infection surveillance registry to identify consecutive patients with a diagnosis of VAP who were admitted to the CCPU. Using electronic medical records, subjects with VAP who were on PMV were selected. The following baseline variables were collected: reason for admission to the institution, demographic data, comorbidities, and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index. Variables collected at diagnosis of VAP were number of days on MV, SOFA score, need for vasoactive agents, and PaO2/FiO2. Data for the 90-day follow-up period after the diagnosis of VAP were also collected, including microbiological isolate results, adequacy of empirical antibiotic treatment, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality. We used these variables to search for factors associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality. Given the retrospective nature of the study, no written informed consent was required. The study was approved by the institutional research department. All data were kept confidential, and the study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
 
Study population and definitions
 
Patients ≥ 18 years of age who were on PMV and had been in the CCPU for at least 48 h prior to the onset of VAP were included in the study, regardless of having had previous episodes of VAP. Subjects who developed VAP in other units or within 48 h after admission to the CCPU were excluded. In patients with more than one episode of VAP, a new episode was defined as the development of new clinical, radiological, and bacteriological findings after completion of the antibiotic treatment of the previous episode. In accordance with the National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care, we defined PMV as MV for ≥ 21 days for at least 6 h/day.(9) We used the definition of the National Hospital Infection Surveillance Program of Argentina (Programa de Vigilancia de Infecciones Hospitalarias de Argentina), which defines VAP on the basis of clinical and radiological criteria(20): presence of at least one of the major criteria (temperature > 38°C, and white blood cell count > 12,000 cells/mm3 or < 4,000 cell/mm3) and at least one of the three minor criteria (purulent sputum, decreased PaO2/FiO2, and new or persistent infiltrates on at least two chest X-rays). Microbiological diagnosis of VAP was confirmed by blood cultures (detection of growth of microorganisms, with no other obvious cause); by quantitative cultures of BAL fluid samples (≥ 104 CFU/mL); or by quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirate samples (≥ 105 CFU/mL).(20)
 
Organ function was assessed using the SOFA score,(21) calculated within the first 24 h after the diagnosis of VAP. Comorbidities were assessed by age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index.(22) We defined VAP-related use of vasoactive drugs as the prescription of noradrenaline or dopamine at any time from the day of the diagnosis of VAP to the end of antibiotic treatment. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio recorded was the one obtained at the time closest to the onset of VAP. Microbiological cultures were ordered by attending physicians in accordance with institutional protocols and incubated in standard media. We performed quantitative cultures of the isolates in respiratory samples. Bacterial identification was carried out using conventional biochemical tests and an automated microbiology system (BD Phoenix; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion, and colistin susceptibility was determined by the automated system (BD Phoenix), in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations.(23)
 
Statistical analysis
 
Statistical analyses were performed with R Studio, version 3.5.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous variables are expressed as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges, according to their distribution. Qualitative variables are shown as absolute and relative frequencies. We carried out univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with mortality. Qualitative variables were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test, whereas continuous variables with parametric and nonparametric distribution were compared using the Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Cox regression models were used in order to find predictors of 30-day and 90-day mortality. All of the variables showing p < 0.25 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. Nested models were selected using Akaike information criterion. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were performed for variables associated with 90-day mortality. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were used in order to identify variables associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality. All tests were two-sided, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
 
RESULTS
 
Patient characteristics
 
During the study period, 80 episodes of VAP were identified in 62 patients on PMV, 13 of whom had more than 1 episode of VAP (2 episodes in 9 patients, 3 episodes in 3 patients, and 4 episodes in 1 patient). The characteristics of the patients and clinical presentation of VAP are shown in Table 1. There was a slight predominance in males, and 40 episodes (50%) occurred in patients aged > 70 years. The major reasons for hospital admission were community-acquired pneumonia, in 20 patients (25.0%); stroke, in 19 (23.7%); infections other than VAP, in 7 (8.7%); traumatic brain injury, in 7 (8.7%); and congestive heart failure, in 5 (6.2%).


 
Regarding MV, all of the patients were submitted to tracheostomy, and the median number of days on MV from the onset of VAP was 56 (range, 21-564 days). Pathogens were identified in 65 of the 80 episodes (81.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa accounting for almost half of the microbiological isolates, whereas no Staphylococcus aureus was isolated. There was only 1 episode in which two different isolates were identified (P. aeruginosa and Providencia stuartii). Antibiotic resistance patterns are shown in Table 2. The most commonly used empirical antibiotic treatment regimens used were meropenem+colistin; meropenem+colistin+vancomycin; and piperacillin/tazobactam+colistin, in 23 (29%), 22 (27%), and 13 (16%) of the overall number of VAP episodes, respectively. Beta-lactam antibiotics were prescribed as definite therapy in 65 (81%) of the episodes (combined with other antibiotics in 28), as were colistin as monotherapy in 11 and aerosolized colistin+parenteral antibiotics in 7 (all cases of P. aeruginosa infection).


 
All but 1 patient completed 30-day follow-up in the unit. That patient was referred to a long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) once the antibiotic treatment was completed. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates after the diagnosis of VAP were 30.0% and 63.7%, respectively.
 
Time of onset of VAP
 
Figure 1 shows the frequency of VAP episodes in relation to duration of MV in days. Between days 21 and 50 of MV, 36 of the 80 episodes of VAP (45.0%) occurred. By day 90, there had already been 62 episodes of VAP (77.5%).
 
Factors associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality rates
 
The Cox regression model showed that the SOFA score and use of vasoactive agents were associated with 30-day mortality, whereas age, SOFA score, use of vasoactive agents, and COPD were associated with 90-day mortality (Table 3). In a post-hoc analysis, we explored the interaction between PaO2/FiO2 < 200 and SOFA score and between PaO2/FiO2 < 200 and use of vasoactive agents by adding an interaction term to the model. None of the interactions were significant (p = 0.15 and p = 0.09, respectively). Figure 2 shows Kaplan-Meier curves for the variables associated with 90-day mortality. Among the patients who received vasoactive agents, 22 (68%) had a SOFA score > 5, and 10 (32%) had a SOFA score ≤ 5 (p < 0.001).



 
DISCUSSION
 
We performed a retrospective analysis of VAP patients on PMV. We found that age, SOFA score, use of vasoactive agents, and COPD were associated with increased mortality. To our knowledge, this is the study with one of the largest cohorts of VAP patients on PMV and the first one to address predictors of mortality. The lack of information on this topic could be partly due to the variety of terms that have been coined to study this population and the different ways in which such terms have been defined over time. We decided to use PMV to include subjects with VAP, because, in a retrospective study, it is easier to identify patients by the length of MV, in accordance with the definition of the National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care.(9) However, using the definition of the Chronically Critically Ill Population Payment Recommendations,(7) all of our patients could be considered patients with CCI.
 
In our cohort, we found an elderly population with a significant burden of comorbidities, mainly due to neurological impairment. This is in line with a study on VAP in an LTACH.(24) In that study, 19 patients had 23 episodes of VAP, 69% of whom required MV due to a neurological cause. Neurological impairment probably explains the difficulty in weaning from MV and the need for PMV.
 
Regarding microbiological isolates, all of the episodes of VAP in our study were caused by gram-negative bacilli, almost half of them being P. aeruginosa, corroborating one study involving subjects with VAP in an LTACH,(24) reports of the U.S. National Healthcare System Network,(25) and a study on VAP in tracheostomized patients.(26) P. aeruginosa is one of the leading causes of VAP worldwide.(27,28) Prior P. aeruginosa colonization of the airway is a crucial factor for developing VAP. (29) It is possible that patients on PMV and submitted to tracheostomy have higher rates of colonization, partially explaining such observations. No S. aureus was isolated from our patients, which might corroborate the findings of a study that reported a lower proportion of VAP caused by S. aureus in late-onset VAP than in early-onset VAP.(30)
 
The median number of days on MV prior to the onset of VAP was 56, which is considerably lower than that reported by Walkey et al.(24)—median = 166 days (IQR, 66-450). Unlike an LTACH, our unit receives patients immediately after the acute stage of a critical illness, which explains the shorter time from MV to the onset of VAP. The 30-day mortality rate was 30%. The mortality of patients with VAP ranges from 20% to 50%, with an attributable mortality of 13%.(31) However, those data come from cases of VAP during acute MV. Few studies have addressed VAP in patients on PMV. In a small study about VAP in tracheostomized patients, 3 of 12 died,(26) but larger scale studies are needed to establish the mortality rate in this population. Furthermore, the mortality of patients with CCI is considerably high: in-hospital mortality rates range from 17% to 31%, whereas 6-month and 12-month mortality rates are 49% and 68%, respectively.(3,32,33) Infections have been identified as one of the factors associated with mortality in patients with CCI.(33) However, the mortality attributable to VAP in this population has yet to be determined.
 
We found factors associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality in our population. There are some scores to predict mortality in patients with CCI, such as the designated ProVent score,(34) but they are not specific for VAP. Similar to the predictions based on the ProVent score, we found that age and the use of vasoactive agents were associated with fatal outcomes. Although the SOFA score includes the use of vasoactive agents as a factor, their use on any day of the VAP episode until the end of the antibiotic treatment were taken into consideration, and the SOFA score was calculated using the results obtained for the variables at the time closest to the diagnosis of VAP. We observed that almost two-thirds of the patients who received vasoactive agents had higher SOFA scores, so collinearity cannot be entirely ruled out. However, the effect of vasoactive agents on mortality was greater than that predicted on the basis of the SOFA score, and some patients who received vasoactive drugs had lower SOFA scores. Therefore, the exact influence of each variable has yet to be determined.
 
The SOFA score is a useful tool for predicting mortality in critically ill patients. Although this tool is used in different ways (differences between SOFA scores obtained on different days, highest score, mean score, etc.), the initial SOFA score has been proven to have value in predicting ICU mortality.(19) In patients with VAP, the SOFA score has also been validated as a prognostic factor,(35,36) although those studies were carried out in acute care ICUs. Tseng et al.(35) included 163 patients with VAP; however, only 42 (26%) of those were tracheostomized, and a subgroup analysis was not performed, which makes it difficult to extrapolate their results to the CCI population.
 
The relationship between COPD and VAP has been studied to some extent; both conditions interact in a number of levels: COPD patients on MV are at an increased risk of VAP. COPD is an independent factor associated with increased mortality, longer length of MV, longer length of ICU stay, and higher rates of infection with P. aeruginosa in patients with VAP.(37-40) Our results are in line with the results in those studies with patients on acute MV.(37-40) However, we found no association between COPD and 30-day mortality, even though there was a trend toward that (p = 0.06). This could be due to the small number of patients in our study, but it might also reflect a greater effect of COPD on 90-day mortality. It is probable that the longer the patient is followed from the onset of VAP, the greater will be the effect of chronic conditions on mortality. Similar considerations could be drawn regarding age. In patients with CCI and a high burden of comorbidities, chronic conditions and age weigh more consistently on long-term outcomes, matching overall mortality. Perhaps a shorter endpoint, such as 30-day mortality, is more suitable for this population in order to define the attributable mortality of nosocomial infections. Comparative, prospective studies are needed to shed light on this issue.
 
The present study has several limitations. First, it is a study carried out in a single center. The settings of care provision for patients on PMV may differ among other centers and have heterogeneous populations. In fact, our results might not be generalizable to patients at LTACHs, because several of those patients may not have complications or characteristics similar to those of patients with CCI. Second, the retrospective nature of the study may carry biases inherent to this type of design. Some variables and confounders may not have been taken into account given the difficulty of including them in a retrospective study. Although we tried to control for confounders using Cox regression analysis, we cannot fully rule out that other variables not included in the analysis, such as the time of antibiotic therapy initiation or the presence of coinfections, might have affected our results. Third, the definition used for VAP might have led to the inclusion of some patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, which is a limitation inherent to the definition. Fourth, the sample size was somewhat small, so external validity might have been compromised and the results might not be fully generalizable for some of the findings. This highlights the need for multicenter studies that address the particular aspects of VAP patients on PMV.
 
In conclusion, we found a high burden of comorbidities in our sample, mostly related to neurological conditions, as well as considerably high 30-day and 90-day mortality rates. We identified factors associated with fatal outcomes, which could help identify patients who might benefit from adequate, early empirical antibiotic treatment, as well as determine prognoses. These findings should be validated by studies with larger samples of patients.
 
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 
SN: study design; data collection; literature search; data analysis; drafting of the manuscript; and approval of the final version. GR: study design; data collection; literature search; drafting of the manuscript; and approval of the final version. MSZ and ME: study design; drafting of the manuscript; and approval of the final version. MTV: study design; drafting of the manuscript; final revision; and approval of the final version.
 
REFERENCES
 



  1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, Knaus WA. Changes in hospital mortality for United States intensive care unit admissions from 1988 to 2012. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):R81. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12695

  2. Moran JL, Bristow P, Solomon PJ, George C, Hart GK; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Database Management Committee (ADMC). Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(1):46-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58

  3. Kahn JM, Le T, Angus DC, Cox CE, Hough CL, White DB, et al. The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States*. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(2):282-287. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000710

  4. Marchioni A, Tonelli R, Sdanganelli A, Gozzi F, Musarò L, Fantini R, et al. Prevalence and development of chronic critical illness in acute patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care setting. Pulmonology. 2020;26(3):151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.09.006

  5. Loss SH, Nunes DSL, Franzosi OS, Salazar GS, Teixeira C, Vieira SRR. Chronic critical illness: are we saving patients or creating victims?. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(1):87-95. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20170013

  6. Marchioni A, Fantini R, Antenora F, Clini E, Fabbri L. Chronic critical illness: the price of survival. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45(12):1341-1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12547

  7. Flood S. Chronically Critically Ill Population Payment Recommendations (CCIP-PR). U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS.gov) Baltimore: CMS 2014. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjujbic9qPwAhX3qJUCHTA9C0cQFjABegQIAxAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Finnovation.cms.gov%2Ffiles%2Freports%2Fchronicallycriticallyillpopulation-report.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2xAcumhDBCWKmZYxyd8kwg

  8. Ambrosino N, Vitacca M. The patient needing prolonged mechanical ventilation: a narrative review. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2018;13:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-018-0118-7

  9. MacIntyre NR, Epstein SK, Carson S, Scheinhorn D, Christopher K, Muldoon S, et al. Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: report of a NAMDRC consensus conference. Chest. 2005;128(6):3937-3954. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.6.3937

  10. Lone NI, Walsh TS. Prolonged mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: epidemiology, outcomes and modelling the potential cost consequences of establishing a regional weaning unit. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R102. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10117

  11. Loss SH, de Oliveira RP, Maccari JG, Savi A, Boniatti MM, Hetzel MP,  et al. The reality of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: a multicenter study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2015;27(1):26-35. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20150006

  12. Scheinhorn DJ, Hassenpflug MS, Votto JJ, Chao DC, Epstein SK, Doig GS, et al. Post-ICU mechanical ventilation at 23 long-term care hospitals: a multicenter outcomes study. Chest. 2007;131(1):85-93. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-1081

  13. Kalb TH, Lorin S. Infection in the chronically critically ill: unique risk profile in a newly defined population. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18(3):529-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0704(02)00009-X

  14. Wang Y, Eldridge N, Metersky ML, Verzier NR, Meehan TP, Pandolfi MM, et al. National trends in patient safety for four common conditions, 2005-2011. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(4):341-351. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1300991

  15. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Palmer LB, et al. Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society [published correction appears in Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;64(9):1298] [published correction appears in Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 15;65(8):1435] [published correction appears in Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 29;65(12):2161]. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(5):e61-e111. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw353

  16. Rumbak MJ. Pneumonia in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Microbes Infect. 2005;7(2):275-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2004.12.002

  17. Ahmed QA, Niederman MS. Respiratory infection in the chronically critically ill patient. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitis. Clin Chest Med. 2001;22(1):71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-5231(05)70026-5

  18. Kobayashi H, Uchino S, Takinami M, Uezono S. The Impact of Ventilator-Associated Events in Critically Ill Subjects With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. Respir Care. 2017;62(11):1379-1386. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05073

  19. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001;286(14):1754-1758. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.14.1754

  20. Argentina. Ministerio de Salud. Programa Nacional de Epidemiologia y Control de Infecciones Hospitalarias (VIHDA) [homepage on the Internet: Buenos Aires: VIHDA; c2014 [cited 2020 Sep 1]. Manual de Vigilancia de Infecciones Hospitalarias de Argentina, Versión Enero 2014. [Adobe Acrobat document, 211p.]. Available from: http://vihda.gov.ar/sitio%20vihdaii/archivospublicaciones/vihda/Manual_de_VIGILANCIA-2014.pdf

  21. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751

  22. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245-1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5

  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed. CLSI supplement m100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020.

  24. Walkey AJ, Reardon CC, Sulis CA, Nace RN, Joyce-Brady M. Epidemiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(4):319-324. https://doi.org/10.1086/596103

  25. Chitnis AS, Edwards JR, Ricks PM, Sievert DM, Fridkin SK, Gould CV. Device-associated infection rates, device utilization, and antimicrobial resistance in long-term acute care hospitals reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(10):993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1086/667745

  26. Magdić Turković T, Obraz M, Zlatić Glogoški M, Juranić I, Bodulica B, Kovačić J. Incidence, Etiology and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients with Percutaneous Tracheotomy. Acta Clin Croat. 2017;56(1):99-109. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2017.56.01.15

  27. Koulenti D, Tsigou E, Rello J. Nosocomial pneumonia in 27 ICUs in Europe: perspectives from the EU-VAP/CAP study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36(11):1999-2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2703-z

  28. Barbier F, Andremont A, Wolff M, Bouadma L. Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: recent advances in epidemiology and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013;19(3):216-228. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835f27be

  29. Kollef MH, Chastre J, Fagon JY, François B, Niederman MS, Rello J, et al. Global prospective epidemiologic and surveillance study of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(10):2178-2187. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000510

  30. Restrepo MI, Peterson J, Fernandez JF, Qin Z, Fisher AC, Nicholson SC. Comparison of the bacterial etiology of early-onset and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia in subjects enrolled in 2 large clinical studies. Respir Care. 2013;58(7):1220-1225. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02173

  31. Melsen WG, Rovers MM, Groenwold RH, Bergmans DC, Camus C, Bauer TT, et al. Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised prevention studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(8):665-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70081-1

  32. Lai CC, Shieh JM, Chiang SR, Chiang KH, Weng SF, Ho CH, et al. The outcomes and prognostic factors of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28034. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28034

  33. Lu HM, Chen L, Wang JD, Hung MC, Lin MS, Yan YH, et al. Outcomes of prolonged mechanic ventilation: a discrimination model based on longitudinal health insurance and death certificate data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-100

  34. Carson SS, Kahn JM, Hough CL, Seeley EJ, White DB, Douglas IS, et al. A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(4):1171-1176. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182387d43

  35. Tseng CC, Liu SF, Wang CC, Tu ML, Chung YH, Lin MC, et al. Impact of clinical severity index, infective pathogens, and initial empiric antibiotic use on hospital mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(7):648-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.08.017

  36. da Silveira F, Nedel WL, Cassol R, Pereira PR, Deutschendorf C, Lisboa T. Acinetobacter etiology respiratory tract infections associated with mechanical ventilation: what impacts on the prognosis? A retrospective cohort study. J Crit Care. 2019;49:124-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.10.034

  37. Koulenti D, Parisella FR, Xu E, Lipman J, Rello J. The relationship between ventilator-associated pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: what is the current evidence? [published correction appears in Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 28;:]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(4):637-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03486-2

  38. Koulenti D, Blot S, Dulhunty JM, Papazian L, Martin-Loeches I, Dimopoulos G, et al. COPD patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: implications for management. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(12):2403-2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2495-6

  39. Rouzé A, Cottereau A, Nseir S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(5):525-531. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000123

  40. Makris D, Desrousseaux B, Zakynthinos E, Durocher A, Nseir S. The impact of COPD on ICU mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Med. 2011;105(7):1022-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2011.03.001



Indexes

Development by:

© All rights reserved 2024 - Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia