Objectives: To evaluate clinical, laboratorial, epidemiological, and therapeutic aspects of patients presenting with multiresistant tuberculosis (MRTB). Patients and methods: From January 1993 to December 1994, a prospective, non-randomized study of patients presenting MRTB, characterized by failures under treatment schemes E-1 and E-3 according to the classification of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, and resistance to isoniazid and rifampicin was carried out. Clinical and laboratorial aspects were considered: age, gender, ethnical group, duration of condition, cavity occurrences in conventional X-rays, resistance to drugs by the indirect method according to Canetti's et al. proportional criteria; epidemiological aspects such as risk predictor factors for multiresistance and treatment results. This study consisted in two alternative chemotherapy courses combining an aminoglycoside, amikacin (Group A), or S, if sensitive (Group B), ofloxacin, clofazimine, in addition to other drugs, such as thiacetazone, ethambutol, or pyrazinamide, according to the sensitivity or to the prior limited use for a minimum of twelve months. Patients with unilateral radiologic lesions, functional possibilities, and who have accepted the indication were submitted to surgery (Group C). Treatment was at the outpatient clinic, self-administered, or under indirect supervision, with hospital admission allowed for clinical reasons, for a limited time, or when surgery was indicated. Patients with prior alternative treatment, those infected with HIV, pregnant patients, and those with renal failure were excluded from the study. Evaluation extended to twelve months after completion of treatment. Results: 70 patients with mean age of 37 years, 42 male, 44 caucasian, and 26 non-caucasian (two orientals), average duration of the condition of four years, and bilateral cavitary lesions in 55 (78.6%). Resistance to two drugs in 28.6%, 51.4% to three drugs, and 20% to four drugs. The most frequent risk predictor factor for MRTB was abandonment (54.3%) followed by recurrence after cure with treatment scheme E1 and failure at retreatment (14.3%), intolerance to drugs (11.4%), contact with MRTB (8.6%). The risk predictor factor could not be determined in 11%, acquired multiresistance being considered in 80%, and primary multiresistance in only 8.6% of the patients. Cure was observed in 25 patients of Group A (n = 39), 11 patients of Group B (n = 24), and 3 of Group C (n = 7). Only two discontinued treatment (A) and only two died during treatment (C). In the control period, three patients had recurrences (1 in A, and 2 in B), and 7 died (3 in A, 2 in B, and 2 in C). The effectiveness of Group A was 67.6% (25/37) at completion of treatment, and 64.9% during the post-treatment control. The effectiveness of Group B was 45.8% (11/24) at completion of treatment, and 37.5% during the post-treatment control. The effectiveness of Group C was 42.8% (3/7) at completion of treatment and during the post-treatment control. After twelve months, effectiveness at treatment completion in Group A fell from 64.1% to 61.5%, in Group B, it fell from 45.8% to 37.5%, and it remained unchanged in 42.8% in Group C, where the four cases of failure died. Drug discontinuation due to adverse effects occurred late in two cases, and other adverse effects were noted, but did not foster discontinuation of treatment.

Abstract Objective: The incidence of tuberculosis worldwide has emphasized the need for better assays designed to diagnose the disease, principally the extrapulmonary form. The objective of the present study was to validate the performance of an automated method for the determination of adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity in pleural fluid (PF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), comparing it with a conventional method (the modified Giusti method). Methods: In total, 134 samples were selected from among those tested in our laboratory: 94 PF samples and 40 CSF samples. The ADA activity was determined using the two methods. Inter- and intra-assay precision was determined, linear regression analysis was performed, simple concordance tests were conducted, and the means of the differences were calculated. Results: The correlation coefficients for PF and CSF samples were, respectively, 0.96 and 0.95. Inter-assay precision was determined using 21 replicates at 3 different activity levels: low, medium and high. The percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) was, respectively, 5.9, 8.1 and 5.8 for PF samples, compared with 21.9, 18.6 and 13.8 for CSF samples. Intra-assay precision in %CV was 1.3 and 11.7, respectively, for PF and CSF samples. The concordance between the methods in PF and CRF samples was, respectively, 96.8% and 100%, considering the reference values for the diagnosis of TB to be 40 U/L (conventional) and 30 U/L (automated) in PF samples, versus 9 U/L (for both methods) in CSF samples. Conclusions: The results validate the use of the automated method of determining ADA activity in PF and CSF samples as an alternative to the conventional method.

Keywords: Adenosine deaminase; Tuberculosis/diagnosis; Pleural effusion; Cerebrospinal fluid.