Introduction: The patient with COPD has his global physical activity decreased due to a progressive worsening of the lung function resultant from any kind of physical effort he may perform. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is used in the United States and Europe as an alternative therapy in COPD treatment. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of PR as an ancillary treatment for COPD. Patients and methods: 30 patients prospectively submitted to the PR program developed in six weeks with three weekly sessions. Evaluation included clinical history and complete physical examination, the six-minute walking distance test, maximum workload test for upper limbs, maximum load test for lower limbs, a questionnaire of effort perception, spirometry and analysis of blood gases. Results: Concerning spirometry and analysis of blood gases, pre and post PR program, no statistically significant change was observed (p > 0.05). Pre and post PR program, statistically significant values (p < 0.05) were observed in the decrease in effort perception and increase in functional physical capacity, maximum workload test for upper limbs and incremental test for lower limbs used to determine the maximum workload. Conclusions: The authors concluded that, in the group studied, the PR program increased the patients' physical capacity and maximum workload for upper limbs whereas no changes were observed in the data regarding spirometry and analysis of blood gases.

Keywords: Rehabilitation. Therapeutical approaches. Lung diseases obstructive. Treatment outcome. Exercise therapy.

Introduction: Spirometry and analysis of blood gases data have been extensively used to assess ventilatory limitation and prognosis of COPD patients. However, functional physical tests, such as the six-minute walk test (6wt) have been used for the dynamic assessment of COPD patients. Objective: To determine correlations between respiratory function test data and the six-minute walk test in COPD patients. Patients and methods: 45 patients were submitted to clinical history survey and complete physical examination performed by the medical staff of the Pneumology Department of the Brasilia University Hospital, followed by spirometry, analysis of arterial blood gases, maximal respiratory pressures data, and the six-minute walk test. Results: Concerning the spirometric, analysis of blood gases and maximal respiratory pressures data, statistically significant positive correlations (p < 0.05) between FEV1, PaO2, SpO2, MEP and the six-minute walk test were obtained. Conclusions: For the studied group, the six minute walk test has significant correlation with FEV1, PaO2, SpO2 and MEP, and can be used as an alternative functional assessment of COPD patients.

Background: The six minutes walk test has been increasingly utilized to assess the effectiveness of different clinical and surgical treatment options in pulmonary diseases. However lack of standardization for their performance may influence measurements and jeopardize assessment of the functional capacity of patients with cardiopulmonary disease. Objective: To determine the possible effects of learning on the distance covered during the six minute walk test for bearers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Method: A retrospective analysis of 35 medical records of COPD patients referred to the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program of the University Hospital of Brasília was carried out. On alternate days these patients had performed two six minutes walk tests, spirometry and arterial blood gas analysis. Clinical and functional diagnosis was based upon the history of exposure to risk factors, mucus production, dyspnea and spirometric dysfunction after use of bronchodilators. The Student test was used for the comparison of results that were different. Results: The distances covered in the second six-minute walk test (515 ± 82 meters) were greater than those covered in the first six-minute walk test (480 ± 85 metros), with statistically significant differences (p<0.05). However measurements of the muscular effort and perception of dyspnea (Borg scale), peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory and heart rates did not disclose any statistically significant differences between the two tests (p<0.05). Conclusion: The present study suggests that in order to standardize the six minutes walk test, the procedure should be performed at least twice to better assess the functional capacity of patients, bearers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Keywords: Walking. Effectiveness. Lung diseases, obstrutive.