Summary: b-agonists are considered the agents of first choice for the treatment of asthmatic symptoms and are usually available for aerosol administration. Its propellants damage the ozone layer and are often not used properly by the patients. Turbuhaler seems a better alternative since it does not present these inconveniences. In Brazil, it has been recently introduced. Purpose: Compare salbutamol aerosol (SA) to terbutaline turbuhaler (TT) in relation to technical use, bronchodilation and adverse effects in outpatients with mild-obstruction asthma (PFR ³ 60 and < 80% predicted). Material and methods: Open, parallel randomized study performed in each arm of 20 patients (SA: 200 mg and TT: 500 mg). After 30 minutes, a second dose was given if PFR was not 15% or 30 L/min greater than the initial one; a second dose was also delivered if PFR was not greater than 80%. All patients were instructed on how to use both devices. Results: Clinical improvement and increase in PFR were similar in both groups (SA 69.5 vs. TT 58.1 L/min, p > 0.05). A second dose was given to 13 patients (SA 6 and TT 7) with similar results. Errors in the usage were observed in all 20 patients of group SA vs. 11 patients in group TT (p < 0.05). Adverse effects were more frequent with TT - 9 patients - due to its unpleasant taste. Fifteen patients of group TT and with previous experience with SA considered turbuhaler easier. Conclusions: 1) administration by the patient is easier with turbuhaler than with SA; 2) bronchodilation is not different with SA 200 mg and TT 500 mg; 3) unpleasant taste was noted only in group TT (50% of the patients).

Keywords: Asthma. Salbutamol aerosol. Terbutaline Turbuhaler.