Background: Lung volume reduction surgery is an alternative treatment for advanced pulmonary emphysema. Radiological evaluation of the type and distribution of emphysema, together with the results of pulmonary function testing, seem to be the main criteria used in deciding whether or not the procedure is indicated. Objective: To determine the extent of scientific evidence available regarding the radiological profile of the ideal candidate for lung volume reduction surgery. Method: A systematic review of the literature from January 1994 to January 2004 using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMbase, LILACS, The Cochrane Library and EBM Reviews. Results: Of 208 articles identified, 16 met the study criteria. Two were randomized (one multicentric, named the 'National Emphysema Treatment Trial' and including 1218 patients, and the other including only 30 patients). The other 14 articles were observational studies. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial identified a subgroup of patients with favorable prognoses when submitted to lung volume reduction surgery. This group consisted of patients with advanced heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema with upper lobe predominance, diffuse pulmonary distention and low exercise capacity. The pattern of the results obtained in the remainder of the studies was consistent with the individual analyses, despite their heterogeneity. In the observational studies, surgical benefit, mortality rates and quality of life were assessed. Conclusion: The radiological pattern, characterized by the type, heterogeneity, distribution and diffuse distention, together with the degree of emphysema severity, represents the main predictor of a positive surgical outcome. Due to the paucity of studies in the literature, this is a grade B recommendation.

Keywords: Pulmonary emphysema. Lung surgery. Tomography X-ray computed. Review.

Objective: To quantify the use of health care resources among patients enrolled in the Bahia State Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis Control Program. Methods: As of January of 2006, 1405 patients had enrolled in the program, which is carried out in four referral centers in the city of Salvador. These patients formed the basis of this retrospective/prospective, observational cohort study. The preliminary analysis involved 269 consecutive patients, all above the age of 12 and diagnosed with severe asthma. After being seen by pulmonologists, nurses, pharmacologists and psychologists, the patients received inhaled asthma medications. Based on patient interviews and charts, the year preceding enrollment in the program was compared with the first year enrolled in the program in terms of the following quantifiable parameters: hospital admissions; emergency room visits; courses of oral corticosteroids; and days of school/work missed due to asthma attacks. Results: In this sample of patients with severe asthma, enrollment in the program resulted in significant reductions in the number of emergency room visits and hospital admissions (of 85% and 90%, respectively). There were also reductions in the number of school/work days missed due to asthma attacks and in the number of courses of oral corticosteroids (of 86% and 67%, respectively). Conclusion: A program designed to control severe asthma in referral outpatient clinics and including pharmacological services at no charge can lead to a pronounced reduction in the demand for Unified Health Care System resources.

Keywords: Asthma/therapy; Asthma/prevention  control; Hospitalization; National Health System (BR)