Recent studies suggest that non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) improves clinical signs and gas exchange, apart from avoiding the need for endotracheal intubation in selected patients with acute respiratory failure. In this prospective, open trial in the Intensive Care Unit (Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora), the authors evaluated the efficacy and security of using NPPV in patients with acute respiratory failure. Twenty-five patients with clinical or gasometric diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (respiratory rate > 25 breaths/min, accessory muscle use, PaO2 < 60 mmHg, PaCO2 > 50 mmHg after supplemental oxygen) received NPPV. Fifteen patients (60%) were successfully ventilated with NPPV, avoiding the tracheal intubation. After two hours with NPPV, the respiratory rate was reduced (from 36 ± 2 breaths/min to 26 ± 1 breaths/min, p < 0.01) and the PaO2 increased (from 76 ± 6 mmHg to 100 ± 12 mmHg, p < 0.05). Among the patients with hypercapnia, after two hours, the PaCO2 decreased (from 60 ± 2 mmHg to 49 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.05). Four patients (16%) presented complications with facial skin necrosis, but only one had the NPPV stopped. Among the patients who did not respond to the method, three did not adapt to the NPPV and seven had it interrupted because of clinical deterioration. The authors conclude that NPPV is a safe option that can be used to treat selected patients with acute respiratory failure.

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of the ampicillin-quinolone association in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Design: Open, prospective study carried out at the Emergency room of the Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Patients and methods: From March 1994 to September 1995, the authors studied 23 patients with fever and with at least three of the following symptoms: cough, purulent sputum, pleuritic thoracic pain, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and a chest radiological examination showing infiltrations compatible with pneumonia diagnosis. The patient diagnosis would be severe pneumonia if he met the criteria of severe sepsis as established by the American College of Chest Physicians and by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Results: 23 patients were studied. One was excluded after having a pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis; 21 patients were considered cured and one died. Adverse drug effects occurred in one patient who presented a mild pharmacodermia. Conclusion: Ampicillin-quinolone is efficient in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Objective: To compare the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to autopsy findings. Methods: All patients who died in the intensive care unit of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora University Hospital between 1995 and 2003 and were submitted to autopsy were included in the study. Patient clinical charts were reviewed to establish whether cases met the AECC criteria for a diagnosis of ARDS, histologically defined as the presence of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). Results: During the study period, 592 patients died, and 22 were submitted to autopsy. Of those 22 patients, 10 (45%) met the AECC criteria, and 7 (32%) met the histopathological criteria for DAD. The AECC clinical criteria presented a sensitivity of 71% (95%CI: 36-92%) and a specificity of 67% (95%CI: 42-85%). The positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 50 and 83%, whereas the positive and negative likelihood ratios were, respectively, 2.33 and 0.47. The histopathological findings in the 5 patients who met AECC criteria but did not present DAD were pneumonia (n = 2), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), tuberculosis (n = 1), and cryptococcosis (n = 1). Conclusion: The accuracy of the AECC definition of ARDS was godless than satisfactory. Due to the low positive predictive value and the low positive likelihood ratio, other hypotheses must be considered when ARDS is suspected.

Keywords: Respiratory distress syndrome, adult; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Autopsy.

Introduction: Surgical procedures requiring aortic occlusion have been associated with pulmonary reperfusion injury. The authors studied the pulmonary edema in a reperfusion injury model by aortic occlusion in rats. Material and methods: Thirty-three Wistar rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (20 mg/kg). Using a midline abdominal incision, the infra-renal aorta was isolated and the animals were randomized into three groups. Ischemia-reperfusion group (IRG, n = 5): rats that underwent 30 min of aorta occlusion and were followed during 120 min of reperfusion. Ischemia group (IG, n = 5): rats that underwent 30 min of aorta occlusion. Control group (CG, n = 5): rats that underwent sham operations without aorta occlusion and were followed during 150 min. Histopathologic examination of the right lung was performed. The pulmonary edema was studied by morphometric analysis and so was the leukocytes infiltration. Eighteen rats (6 rats in each group) were studied with respect to lung fresh/dry weight ratio. ANOVA was used to analyze the morphometric results and the lung fresh/dry weight ratio, with Bonferroni adjustment for paired multiple comparisons. Animals of the IRG presented more pulmonary edema than those of the IG and CG (0.24 vs. 0.17 and 0.17, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups regarding the lung fresh/dry weight ratio. There were more inflammatory cells in the lungs of the rats submitted to ischemia-reperfusion. The authors concluded that infra-renal abdominal aorta cross-clamping and unclamping are associated with pulmonary edema. This edema is not induced by elevation of the hydrostatic pressure due to the aortic occlusion, since it was not seen in animals that were only submitted to ischemia.

Keywords: ischemia, reperfusion, pulmonary edema, inbred strains rats

Objective: To compare the effects of early tracheostomy and of late tracheostomy in patients with acute severe brain injury. Methods: A retrospective study involving 28 patients admitted to the ICU of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora University Hospital in Juiz de Fora, Brazil, diagnosed with acute severe brain injury and presenting with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score < 8 within the first 48 h of hospitalization. The patients were divided into two groups: early tracheostomy (ET), performed within the first 8 days after admission; and late tracheostomy (LT), performed after postadmission day 8. At admission, we collected demographic data and determined the following scores: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, GCS and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Results: There were no significant differences between the groups (ET vs. LT) regarding the demographic data or the scores: APACHE II (26 ± 6 vs. 28 ± 8; p = 0.37), SOFA (6.3 ± 2.7 vs. 7.2 ± 3.0; p = 0.43) and GCS (5.4 ± 1.7 vs. 5.5 ± 1.7; p = 0.87). The 28-day mortality rate was lower in the ET group (9% vs. 47%; p = 0.04). Nosocomial pneumonia occurring within the first 7 days was less common in the ET group, although the difference was not significant (0% vs. 23%; p = 0.13). There were no differences regarding the occurrence of late pneumonia or in the duration of mechanical ventilation between the groups. Conclusions: On the basis of these findings, early tracheostomy should be considered in patients with acute severe brain injury.

Keywords: Tracheostomy; Pulmonary ventilation; Coma.

Objective: Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new potent synthetic inhaled corticosteroid. Internationally, MF is administered via a dry-powder inhaler that contains multiple doses. As a preparation that would be more cost-effective, single-dose MF capsules were developed in Brazil. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two inhalers for MF administration in patients with asthma. Methods: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial involving 74 adult patients with moderate persistent asthma who were randomized into two groups to receive approximately 400 µg of MF once a day for 60 days, either via the multiple-dose inhaler or via the newly developed single-dose inhaler. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the primary endpoints (FEV1 and rescue medication use) or the secondary endpoints (morning PEF, tolerability, and safety, the last as assessed on the basis of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function). Conclusions: The use of the single-dose inhaler developed in Brazil for MF administration is as effective and safe as is that of a standard inhaler in the treatment of patients with asthma. Keywords: Anti-asthmatic agents; Pregnadienediols; Metered dose inhalers.

Keywords: Anti-asthmatic agents; Pregnadienediols; Metered dose inhalers. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00975741 [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/])