Background: It is questionable whether pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) has advantages over volume-cycled ventilation (VCV). Objectives: To compare PCV to VCV with decelerating flow profile during assisted and controlled modes in an acute lung injury experimental model. Methods: Severe acute lung injury (PaO2/FIO2 < 100 mmHg) was induced by oleic acid IV infusion (0.05 mg/kg) in seven dogs. The animals were submitted to PCV and VCV in a randomized sequence. After 40 minutes in the assisted mode, ventilation was changed to the controlled mode after neuromuscular blockade. The tidal volume and the inspiratory time were kept constant throughout the experiment. Results: There were no differences in gas exchange (PaO2 and PaCO2), cardiac output or oxygen delivery (DO2) between VCV and PCV. The same was observed regarding maximum airway and plateau pressures, and also to the static compliance. Oxygen consumption (VO2) after neuromuscular blockade was 124 ± 48 in VCV versus 143 ± 50 ml/min in PCV, p = 0.42. In the assisted mode, there was a statistical trend of a higher VO2 in PCV (219 ± 72 versus 154 ± 67 ml/min in VCV, p = 0.06), that was associated with a statistical trend of a higher oxygen cost of breathing (OCB) during assisted PCV, although without statistical significance (31 ± 77 in VCV versus 75 ± 96 ml/min in PCV, p = 0.23), and also in a lower PvO2 (34 ± 7 in PCV versus 42 ± 6 ml/min in VCV, p = 0.02). These occurred despite a higher maximum inspiratory flow in the assisted mode in PCV (58 ± 9 versus 48 ± 4 L/min in VCV, p = 0.01). In both VCV and PCV the institution of controlled ventilation reduced cardiac debit and DO2 in as much as 20% relative to the assisted mode. Conclusions: The implementation of controlled ventilation improved the oxygen delivery/consumption relationship in this severe and with high OCB acute lung injury model. The PCV offered no additional benefits to VCV and it was associated with a higher OCB during the assisted mode.

Keywords: Artificial respiration. Pulmonary gas exchange. Tidal volume.