Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common cause of chest affections and symptoms, such as chronic cough, asthma, respiratory infections, pulmonary fibrosis and chest pain. Relief after medical or surgical antireflux therapy is variable. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The use of 2 or more pH sensors in different locations within the esophagus is a reliable method for the diagnosis of more severe GER and enables aspiration of the airways and lungs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the height at which reflux is detected within the esophagus is an indicator of surgical, as opposed to medical, antireflux therapy. In a series of 35 patients with cough as a sole presentation of GER the levels of reflux within the esophagus were correlated to the outcome after medical or surgical antireflux therapy. The studies and surgical procedures were performed in the affiliated hospitals of the Federal and Catholic Universities of Pelotas - RS. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney-U test were used to perform statistical analysis. The present study showed that gastroesophageal reflux into either the distal or the proximal esophagus can cause chronic cough. The height of reflux is an important predictor of response to antireflux therapy. Patients with proximal reflux treated medically do poorly. Surgical therapy is consistently associated with a good outcome, regardless of the height to which reflux occurs, particularly in patients with proximal reflux. Overall, surgical therapy provides the best outcome in all patients with chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux.

Keywords: Chronic cough. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal pH monitoring.

Objective: To assess the effect of psychotherapy on levels of anxiety and depression, as well as on quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Methods: A randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial was conducted involving 49 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Patients were randomized into three groups: those submitted to the complete pulmonary rehabilitation program, which included psychotherapy and an exercise regimen (group 1); those submitted to the program minus physical exercise (group 2); and those submitted to the program minus psychotherapy (group 3). The three groups underwent a 12-week treatment program. All patients were evaluated at baseline and at completion of the pulmonary rehabilitation program through four instruments: The Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire were applied. The distance walked-weight product was also calculated. Results: Statistically significant absolute improvements in exercise capacity were found for groups 1 and 2, although not for group 3 (p = 0.007, p = 0.008 and p = 0.06, respectively). In groups 1 and 2, levels of anxiety and depressions were also significantly reduced (group 1: p = 0.0000 and p < 0.0003; group 2: p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0014), and quality of life was significantly improved (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.002, respectively). Anxiety levels were also reduced in group 3 (p = 0.03), although levels of depression were not, and quality of life was unaffected. Conclusion: Psychotherapy sessions provided as part of a pulmonary rehabilitation program assist patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in coping with disease-related limitations by reducing behavioral symptoms, especially depression, thereby influencing exercise capacity and health-related quality of life.

Keywords: Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive/rehabilitation; Pullmonary diseases, chronic obstructive/psychology; Anxiety; Depression; Quality of Life; Exercise therapy